If anyone's after a nice high hit ratio, you can
download the source for procedure "choose_hit_ratio"
from my site...Some examples:

SQL> exec choose_a_hit_ratio(90);
Current ratio is: 86.24731
Another 79053 consistent gets needed...
Current ratio is: 90.5702

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL> exec choose_a_hit_ratio(98,true);
Current ratio is: 90.5709
Another 1141299 consistent gets needed...

Magic for consultants like myself..

"You want a hit ratio of 98%... No problem"

:-)

 --- "Deshpande, Kirti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: > Not quite !! 99.999% or 'the five nines'
sounds much
> better ;-) 
> 
> With 64-bit computing we can address SGA sizes in
> the order of few TBs (if
> not PBs), why worry about disk I/Os except for two
> occasions ;-)) Then the
> 'five nines' can be 'nine nines'. Wow!!  That sounds
> even better.. much much
> better ;-))) 
> 
> 
> - Kirti 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:48 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> 
> 
> Cary Milsap from hotsos has much data to confirm an
> approximate 1:100 ratio 
> between LIO time and PIO time.  
> 
> Can we therefore conclude, that the buffer cache hit
> ratio should be 99%?
> :-)
> 
> Rgds, Bj�rn.
> On Wednesday 20 March 2002 10:48, Connor McDonald
> wrote:
> > Some rudimentary testing on a laptop here (500Mhz,
> > 512M RAM, typical single disk)
> >
> > a) visiting a single block via 4,000,000 logical
> IO's
> > got me approx 35000 gets/sec
> >
> > b) repeated full table scans similar system got me
> > approx 350 phys reads/sec
> >
> > After this extensive, thorough and exhaustive
> > exercise, I can definitely say that memory access
> > versus disk access (as it pertains to Oracle) is
> 100
> > times faster on this machine in single user mode
> >
> > I think we can generalise this to be the rule for
> all
> > servers under all conditions :-)
> >
> > Connor
> >
> > 
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
> http://www.orafaq.com
> --
> Author: Deshpande, Kirti
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX:
> (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California        -- Public Internet
> access / Mailing Lists
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
> E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
> 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
> ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
> from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information
> (like subscribing). 

=====
Connor McDonald
http://www.oracledba.co.uk (mirrored at 
http://www.oradba.freeserve.co.uk)

"Some days you're the pigeon, some days you're the statue"

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?Connor=20McDonald?=
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to