On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, John Kanagaraj wrote:
> Contrary to common understanding, the Cost based optimizer is 'forced' in > certain situations even if the mode is RULE. Examples are: Use of hints > other than RULE, Partitioned tables and indexes, Index-organized tables, > Reverse key indexes, Function-based indexes, SAMPLE clauses in a SELECT > statement, Parallel execution and parallel DML (i.e. presence of DEGREE on > Tables/Indexes), etc. Was this the case? This was the focus of my paper at > IOUG... My mouth dropped open when I read this. News to me. This is a bit astonishing, though I'm sure well documented. Somehow I've passed over it. John, can you send a link to your paper? THanks, Sean -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
