Dennis , thanks for your suggestions.
It seems detection is the only viable option to avoid locking.
i'll try to get the suggested book from somewhere .

ratnesh

-----Original Message-----
WILLIAMS
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:08 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Ratnesh
   I assume you are using the JDBC interface, rather than J2EE. You may want
to consider buying the book "Java Programming with Oracle JDBC" by Donald
Bales. He devotes a chapter to this subject. One issue he raises that will
limit your options is whether you have other applications besides your
Web-based application accessing this database. If not, that gives you
additional flexibility.
   Bales distinguishes between locking and detection. He contends that
locking alone does not solve the problem of multiuser data access integrity,
and offers several examples to support his contention. He then outlines 3
methods for employing detection. He defines detection as the ability to
detect if data you are about to modify has changed since the point when you
selected it to be updated.
   1. Pessimistic. Use an updatestamp
   2. Pessimistic. Compare all the columns in the table  or attributes of an
object with their original values.
   3. Optimistic. Compare only modified columns or attributes in a WHERE
clause.

I wish I could speak from experience, but I think this author has studied
this issue in more detail than I could.

Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:53 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hi

I'm not very familiar with web based application development.
One of our programmers has asked me a question regarding locking issues in
web based applications.In a typical scenario , users access the oracle
database
thro a browser via app-svr/web-svr . Connection pooling is implemented on
the
web-svr to support large no of users. If a user locks some objects via
updates
or deletes , then kills his browser , the objects remains locked.

The question is how to design the system such that abnormal client browser
termination
does not lock any objects.One solution is not to lock objects at all , and
commit immediately after update if the object timestamp has not changed .But
this approach is suitable only for
short & sweet transactions.
Connection timeout is too time-taking for intensive applications to be of
any use.

There must be other better ways of doing this. I need your suggestions.

TIA,
ratnesh


-----------------------------------------------
Ratnesh Kumar Singh
Sr. Software Engineer
Patni Computer Systems Ltd
TTC Mahape , Navi Mumbai
Work : (91 22) 7611090/110/128/350 Ext. 2107
Home : (91 22) 8662162
http://www.patni.com
World-Wide Partnerships. World-Class Solutions.
-----------------------------------------------

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Ratnesh Kumar Singh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Ratnesh Kumar Singh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to