That query give u perfect size in shape of FAT_MB and that's the maximun 
size of intitial extent... I never relied on DBA_FREE_SPACE
Have you coalesed yr tablespace before and after running this query? Besides 
using parallel 2 , it requires 2 extents of 140M instead of one extent of 
140M so u may reduce yr initial extent size to start with 20M for initial 
and next...

If u have any specific question, please let me know

Regards
Rafiq



Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:26:08 -0800

Hmmm...I'm confused.  Your query returns the second biggest chunk from
DBA_FREE_SPACE on that TS.  So, what happened to the 147MB chunk I had?  And
why is my query against DBA_FREE_SPACE invalid for testing the max size of
an initial extent?

BTW, this TS only has one datafile.

Rich Jesse                           System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]              Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Mohammad Rafiq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 5:20 PM
 > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 > Subject: Re: ORA-1658 even though there is enough contig free
 >
 >
 > Rich,
 > 1)Run following script to check fat size which will indicate
 > how big your
 > initial extent may be as you are not finding contigous space in your
 > tablespace. when it ask for value give your tablespace name..
 >
 > undefine table_space
 > set verify off
 > prompt This script provides a report useful for resizing datafiles
 > prompt You should perform a 'ALTER TABLESPACE tsname COALESCE' before
 > running
 > prompt this script to ensure you are getting all free space
 > at end of the
 > file
 > accept table_space prompt "Enter a tablespace_name or all: "
 > select ddf.file_name,
 >        dfs.file_id,
 >        ddf.blocks,
 >        (ddf.blocks*value)/1024/1024 file_size_mb,
 >        dfs.block_id block_hwm,
 >        ddf.blocks-dfs.block_id fat_blocks,
 >        floor(((ddf.blocks-dfs.block_id)*value)/1024/1024)
 > fat_mb,
 >        ceil(((ddf.blocks*value)/1024/1024 -
 >          ((ddf.blocks-dfs.block_id)*value)/1024/1024)) resize_to
 >   from dba_free_space dfs,
 >        dba_data_files ddf,
 >        v$parameter
 > where v$parameter.name = 'db_block_size'
 >    and (ddf.tablespace_name = UPPER('&&table_space')
 >         or 'ALL' = UPPER('&&table_space'))
 >    and dfs.tablespace_name = ddf.tablespace_name
 >    and dfs.file_id = ddf.file_id
 >    and dfs.block_id = (select max(block_id)
 >                          from dba_free_space
 >                         where file_id = dfs.file_id)
 >   order by fat_blocks desc;
 > /
 >
 > 2) Coalesce your tablespace and run this script again..
 > 3) or reduce yr initial extent size and don't use parallel clause
 >
 > HTH,
 > Regards
 > Rafiq
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 13:18:28 -0800
 >
 > Hi all,
 >
 > On 8.1.7.2.0 on HP/UX 11.0, I need to create an index online.
 >  So, I see how
 > much space I have:
 >
 > select max(bytes/1024/1024)
 > from dba_free_space
 > where tablespace_name = 'MY_IDX_TS';
 >
 > ...and it returns "147.3475".  So I create my index:
 >
 > CREATE INDEX myschema.mycoolidx
 >   ON myschema.mycooltbl(mycoolcol) PCTFREE 15
 >      STORAGE(
 >              INITIAL 140 M
 >              NEXT 30 M
 >              )
 > NOLOGGING ONLINE TABLESPACE my_idx_ts PARALLEL 2;
 >
 > But I keep getting "ORA-01658 unable to create initial extent
 > in MY_IDX_TS",
 > even though there is ample room.  I thought it was because I
 > had originally
 > tried it with "PARALLEL 2" and there was some overhead needed, so I
 > coalesced the TS (DICTIONARY, obviously) and tried it without
 > the PARALLEL
 > to no avail.  I've even dropped the INITIAL down to 130M
 > without luck (again
 > after coalescing).  Oh, to be LOCAL...
 >
 > So, how big can I make the initial extent?  I don't remember
 > running into
 > this before and I can't find anything on MetaLink.  And of
 > course, I killed
 > the session when it was creating it so now I can't drop the
 > index without a
 > ORA-8104 error.
 >
 > Anyone?
 >
 > TIA!
 > Rich Jesse                           System/Database Administrator
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Jesse, Rich
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Mohammad Rafiq
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to