show the full sql please, perhaps its how you are grouping your
conditions
Paul Baumgartel wrote:
>I've been given a query to investigate. The performance varies
>extremely depending on whether the entire result set is fetched or a
>ROWNUM < n clause is attached; that makes sense to me. What doesn't
>make sense is the following: if we add WHERE ROWNUM < 50, the query
>returns 24 rows. If we add WHERE ROWNUM < 1000, the query returns 336
>rows!
>
>I don't know the size of the entire result set (I'm running a count
>right now), but if the result set consists of at least 336 rows,
>shouldn't WHERE ROWNUM < 50 return 49 rows?
>
>TIA!
>
>
>
>=====
>Paul Baumgartel, Adept Computer Associates, Inc.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
>http://finance.yahoo.com
>
>
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: ltiu
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
