If adding 400 records slows down the system, I guess it is time to take a
hard look at your set-up and see where the problems are occurring by
measuring and analyzing the waits in the database. 

How did you establish that balancing indexes causes the delay? No matter
what kind of solution you implement, I'd still look at the waits that you
see during these inserts, that will explain the problem to you.

To me, 400 rows causing problem hints at a bigger problem than one visible.
Raj
______________________________________________________
Rajendra Jamadagni              MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.

QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!
*********************************************************************This e-mail 
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may 
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank 
you.*********************************************************************2

Reply via email to