Raj,
Do you
have any test cases or white papers to support your statement? Especially
the part about
"if you mix-n-match that will make Oracle do more
work."
never heard of this before and I am interested if it is
true.
Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamadagni, Rajendra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:33 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Does the case of an Oracle query statement affect query perfoAs long as you stick to either (a) or (b) you will be okay ... if you mix-n-match that will make Oracle do more work.Raj______________________________________________________Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!
-----Original Message-----
From: Shantanu Datta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:58 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Does the case of an Oracle query statement affect query performance?Hi,Pardon me for such a naive question, coz I am a novice when it comes to Oracle. This is basically got to do with how Oracle parses a query.Consider the following queries:a) SELECT column1, column2 FROM table WHERE column0 = 5;b) SELECT COLUMN1, COLUMN2 FROM TABLE WHERE COLUMN0 =5;Scenario 1: I use the naming convention a) for ALL my queriesScenario 2: I use the naming convention b) for ALL my queriesWill there be any difference in the execution time of the same queries in Scenario 1 vs 2?Thanx in advance,Shantanu.--------------
