Re: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

[Tim Gorman]

Title: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE

It's a question of responsibilities, not knowledge.   Knowing something does not mean that one should continue to be involved.  Most managers (or directors or VPs) who continue to be concerned in this technical detail are not paying attention to the things to which they should be paying attention.  Sure sign of a newbie manager and the most common symptom of the "Peter Principle"... ----- Original Message ----- From: Jamadagni, Rajendra To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:24 AM Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE Some business managers migrate (pardon the pun) from being a techie to a bean counter type. So they know.   Raj ______________________________________________________ Rajendra Jamadagni              MIS, ESPN Inc. Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art! -----Original Message----- From: Gary Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:59 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACE Pardon the ignorance, I'm simply trying to understand... What is meant by "management" in this context? I'm can't imagine a circumstance under which ANY business manager would have a say on what goes on in the black box called Oracle. Downtime? Cost of hardware/software? Vendor selection? I can see the input on those issues. But, all the way down to extent management?? Or am I simply lucky to not have that level of bureaucracy?   Gary Weber Senior DBA Charles Jones, LLC||Superior Information Services, LLC