In that case, I wouldn't worry about it.  :)

On Thursday 07 November 2002 14:19, Jesse, Rich wrote:
> Does the SORT_AREA_SIZE not being a multiple of TEMP extent size have that
> much impact if disk sorts are only 0.03% (3/100ths of 1 percent) of total
> sorts?  My numbers are according to V$SYSSTAT.
>
> What resource is affected?  Disk?  Memory?  CPU?  Beer?
>
> Rich
>
>
> Rich Jesse                           System/Database Administrator
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]              Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI
> USA
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jared Still [mailto:jkstill@;cybcon.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:19 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > Subject: Re: TEMP/RBS LMTs (was: Convert TEMP tablespace...)
> >
> >
> >
> > 10M?  Hardly.  That was just a test script to make sure
> > the syntax was correct.  10m just happens to be created
> > very quickly.
> >
> > The sort_area_size equal or be a multiple of your TEMP
> > extent size.
> >
> > Jared
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jared Still
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to