At 12:07 PM 1/22/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It recently came to my attention that the DBA's where I work have
adopted a
> convention where the global_name of a database is the same for the
> production, test, and development instance of that database (obviously,
> they've turned off global naming in the init.ora).  They've also set up
the

Oracle has stated for some time that global_names=true will be required
in future versions of Oracle, and recommend that that be done now.
Do you happen to have a link to an Oracle document to that effect? I've searched tahiti and metalink, but haven't come up with anything other than documentation that says Oracle recommends global_names=true.


> Our DBA argues that this configuration is strongly preferred by the
majority
> of developers since they don't have to make any changes to their code
when they
> move from development to QA and to test.

Junior developers? If the changing the database name requires code
changes, then
the duhvelopers need some remedial education.
I fully agree. Unfortunately, my project can't really tell other projects to educate their developers.

Thanks!
Justin Cave
Distributed Database Consulting

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Justin Cave
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to