hmmm...
I shouldn't work on two emails at the same time anymore... Can't work in parallel.
The statement should be ...
There will be a parse, but it could be a soft if the SQL exists ... but a parse will happen so, my answer was absolutely irrelevant to the question.
Please ignore, and thanks for correcting me Jared.
(ps: The cut and paste was from an internal email showing reasons for hard parses ...)
Raj
______________________________________________________
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jamadagni, Rajendra
Subject: RE: 10046 trace - weird library misses
Importance: High
Raj, where is it documented that EXEC IMMEDIATE always does a hard parse?
Thanks,
Jared
********************************************************************This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank you.*********************************************************************2
