Val, Replication would add a prefix to the table names. If there are tables which differ in the last few characters, then this prefix would make things go haywire :) I do not see any performance issues though... Just a thought! John Kanagaraj Oracle Applications DBA DBSoft Inc (W): 408-970-7002
What would you see if you were allowed to look back at your life at the end of your journey in this earth? ** The opinions and statements above are entirely my own and not those of my employer or clients ** -----Original Message----- Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:49 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Are there any issues to consider when naming tables and/or columns (length of column name)? I know the max length is 30 but some of the table names that my client wants to add (against my recommendation) look like Cobol and are pushing 30 characters. Just wanted to know if there are any potential performance issues or anything else I should warn them about. Thank in advance! Val Valerie H. Webber Management Systems Designers, Inc Database Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] 704-566-5321 -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: John Kanagaraj INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
