Thanks for the explanation of the term licenses, Tim. I have to admit, I
didn't know that there was such a thing called term license for Oracle. I
had a blurb of an idea about software leases, but always thought the support
costs were based on lease, not on perpetual license.

Arup

----- Original Message -----
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 11:24 AM


> This is my understanding of the situation for the US only;  your mileage
may
> vary and I could be very much out of date.  But I don't think things have
> changed a lot...
>
> ---
>
> The perpetual licenses are supposed to be a one-time payment for the
> software, after which you have rights to the software going forward into
> "perpetuity".  Yes, forever is a long time;  we'll see...
>
> The 4-year and 2-year "term" licenses are merely leases on the software
that
> expire.  After the term is over, you no longer have a license.  The 4-year
> term license usually costs 60% of the perpetual license and the 2-year
term
> license usually costs 35% of the perpetual license.  The upsides of the
term
> licenses are obvious:  less upfront cost.  The downside should be equally
> obvious:  you have to make another decision and potentially another
payment
> in 2 or 4 years.  Oracle sales folks hate going through the decision
process
> again, so they try not to mention the term pricing if they can.
>
> The rationale for term licensing is either startup companies or other
> uncertain projects.  Why pay for "perpetuity" when you are unsure that you
> are still going to be around in several years?
>
> Of course, there is some game theory involved.  Oracle changes its
licensing
> schemes every once in a while, and market conditions can always shift.  If
> you pay 35% now, you might have more favorable terms and conditions in two
> year's time.  On the other hand, those shifts in conditions can also work
in
> Oracle's favor and against you, so you may end up missing an opportunity
to
> lock in now.
>
> You rolls the dice, you takes your chances...
>
> If you think you're going to use the software for only 2- or 4-years
total,
> then obviously the term licensing is a good deal overall.  However, let's
> say you use the software for 6 years overall (after which you switch to
> freeware PostGreSQL, which by now has features comparable to Oracle15z).
If
> you buy three successive 2-yr term licenses, you have paid 105% of a
> perpetual license (i.e. 35% times three).  And so on...
>
> ---
>
> Another thing to note:  besides these license costs, you have to factor in
> the on-going support fees, which are charged annually for the duration of
> the license.  They are still (I believe) 22% of a perpetual license.  Note
> that support fees are not discounted into terms the way licenses are.  You
> are always charged a percentage of the full (perpetual) license cost, not
of
> your discounted term license cost.
>
> Of that 22%, 15% goes toward allowing you free upgrades of the software
and
> 7% goes toward the use of Worldwide Support (i.e. MetaLink et al).  So,
when
> you pay the initial license, you are licensing one version of the
software.
> In order to be able to upgrade your license, you have to pay the 15%
annual
> fee.  In order to use MetaLink, you have to pay the 7% annual fee.
>
> Nice business to be in, no?
>
> Hope this helps...
>
>
>
>
> on 6/1/03 1:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > We are concerned on licensing especially as we are setting up a
> > Disaster Recovery Site. During our Investigation it seems that
> > TERM licensing can come out cheaper. Anyone have any idea on
> > this or any disadvantages of leasing the software as opposed to
> > owning it,
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Sam
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> --
> Author: Tim Gorman
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
>
>
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Arup Nanda
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to