According that suggestion you do seem to have redo copy latch contention. 
As far as getting that ratio close to suggested value, you may set some special 
init.ora
parameters. There is plenty of notes on Metalink for that.
But, you should first determine if this is causing any performance issue. Have you 
explored all
other avenues to address those issues. If not, I would not worry about this 
contention. 

- Kirti  

--- "Reddy, Madhusudana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello ALL,
> 
> Do you guys think we have redo copy latch contention ?? Also what are your 
> suggestions on tuning
> Redo Copy Latch ??
> 
> 
>                                       SUBSTR(LN.NAME,1,20)            GETS           
>          MISSES  IMMEDIATE_GETS IMMEDIATE_MISSES
>                                       -------------------- ----------         
> ----------              -------------- ----------------
>                                       redo allocation                         
> 943350646       8862115         0                               0
>                                       redo copy                                      
>  22097                   497             907958724               1592481
> 
>                                       14:54:54 SQL> select (497/22097)*100 from dual;
> 
>                                       (497/22097)*100   ~ (misses/gets)*100
>                                       ---------------
>                                             2.2491741   <------- Oracle suggests it 
> should be under 1%
> 
> 
> Madhu Reddy
> X13944
> 
> 
> -- 
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> -- 
> Author: Reddy, Madhusudana
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Kirtikumar Deshpande
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to