Some time in the past year or so I was reading an article about a similar
problem where they needed to change behavior based on where the connection
originated. I remember something about using IP addresses to drive the
different behaviors. Sorry I can't remember more. It didn't apply to
anything I was doing at the time so I didn't really get into the details.
Might be something to consider.

-----Original Message-----
Mark Richard
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



I think the idea was always "roles plus setting current schema" - not just
roles on their own.  Heck, I'd be so paranoid that I'd make the default
schema empty rather than belonging to a specific site so that if the
executable isn't renamed then it connects to an empty database - it will
make it much easier to track the chance.

I was considering suggesting looking at the IP address to try and determine
originating site but it carries too much risk - dynamic IP's, changing
IP's, etc.  It seems like renaming the executable might be the safest
approach - as long as you make the default schema redundant.

I guess you might have some impact on your ability to tune and debug the
application and monitor usage when everyone is connecting as the same user
but that will be something you'll have to live with.  I guess you could
shoe-horn some other parameters in with the "set schema" command if
different sites have different performance demands (sort_area_size, etc) -
just create a config table in the default schema and write a fancy logon
trigger.




                      "Ryan"
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:       Multiple recipients
of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      >                        cc:
                      Sent by:                 Subject:  Re: security
without using different usernames
                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                      .com


                      16/07/2003 09:44
                      Please respond to
                      ORACLE-L






roles wont work. The tables in the different schemas all have the same
names. The application is not coded to 'schemaA.table'. Its just set to the
table.

roles plus setting the schema is possible to be 'safe' with security. I
like that idea.
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: AK
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:24 PM
 Subject: Re: security without using different usernames

 you can create multiple roles also . So if you have schema a,b,c and they
 use Z as userid to login then create role_a, role_b, role_c where role_a
 has permissions for object in schema a and role_b has permissions for
 schema b  . Enable proper role at the time of startup ( embadded in client
 code ).

 -ak







  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Ryan
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
  Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:29 PM
  Subject: security without using different usernames

  I know this is terrible design, but the GUI was created by a software
  engineering group that is seperate from the database group. Its not
  scalable. So Im trying to come up with a more scalable method. I have no
  power to change their gui. It rides on the database. I have to live with
  it. This is not a high enough transaction database to warrant seperate
  instances.

  We have a variety of customers. Each of them has their own versions of
  data. However, the schema is exactly the same. These tables can get huge,
  so we dont want to throw them all into the same schema.

  Right now, due to the fact that the GUI has a series of logins that are
  the same across clients, each client has its own instance. This isnt very
  scalable as we get more business. We have to create another instance and
  ingest data to it.

  Id like to find a way to get all the clients in the same instance with
  just different schemas and tablespaces. One thing I may have control over
  would be to slightly rename the executable. If you check v$session, in a
  client-server application the name of the product connecting to the
  database is recording. I can handle security based off of that.

  My question is what would be the best way? Cant do synonyms for this
  since its the same login. I think I saw somewhere that there is a session
  based 'set' command where you can say use this schema. I think it was on
  asktom and in reference to a question about public synonyms. I cant find
  it. Anyone know it?

  Also is it viable to base a context off of what is in v$sesion with a
  logon trigger? How would I 'redirect' all queries to a specific schema?

  To stress, I cant change the application. Different group with different
  skillsets. Any suggestions?


<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<---->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
   Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message.
          If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
       (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person),
            you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender
           by reply e-mail or by telephone on (61 3) 9612-6999.
   Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to
                Internet e-mail for messages of this kind.
        Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message
              that do not relate to the official business of
                         Transurban City Link Ltd
         shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<---->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>




<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<---->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message.
If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone.
In such a case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender
by reply e-mail or by telephone on (03) 9612-6999 or (61) 3 9612-6999.
Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to
Internet e-mail for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of Transurban Infrastructure Developments
Limited and CityLink Melbourne Limited shall be understood as neither given
nor endorsed by them.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<---->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Mark Richard
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mark Brooks
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to