|
We
have about 35 instances on each node of RAC they are of course DEVL/ACPT
types.
Raj
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com
All Views expressed in this email are strictly
personal.
QOTD: Any clod can have facts,
having an opinion is an art !
Thanks for the replies so far. Considering the fact that my database is
tiny ( just around 3 GB ), How many of them can work on same server? I can
just test with 5 instances, with limited hardware. Will the CPUs be able to
take load of 100 instances? Is it worth experimenting this?
I am on 8.1.7.4 and the application is already built. I stand no chance
of changing the code. That is why using individual schemas for individual
users is not an option. Right now I am just asked if 100 instances can run on
same server and I don't have solid answer.
Just on side note, can I ask, What is the maximum number of
instances anyone has ever worked/heard being installed with in same
server?
Thanks again.
Dilip.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:54
AM
Subject: Re: What books recommended for
Data Modeling ?
100 instances wohhhhh . If you are in 9i look at
possibilities like context
or label security . or creating another schema
.
-ak
----- Original Message -----
To: "Multiple
recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:24 PM
> I have not heard
installing hundred database instances on same server.
> Maybe you
should think creating one instance, and then hundred schemas in
>
it.
>
> Guang
>
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Dilip Patel
wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > Need some
suggestions/Input.
> >
> > My application database is
8.1.7, NOARCHIVELOG, WIN200,
> > total size 4 GB, more of single
user OLTP client-server application.
> >
> > Now the
customer wants to give training on this application to
hundred
trainees
> > at a time. For this he wants to install
hundred database instances on
same
> > server machine,
which *each* will be accessed simultaneously from 100
different
>
> client workstations.
> >
> > The reasons for
installing all instances on same machine are
> > - to avoid
re-installing databases on 100 workstations after each round
of
>
> training.
> > - No user should see any other user's
data.
> >
> > Please suggest if this approach is feasible
or is it at all possible.
Tested this with upto 5 instances, and
>
> it seems to work. The customer is willing to upgrade to any
hardware
needed for
> > this setup.
> >
> >
Thanks in advance for your time.
> >
> > Dilip.
>
>
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> --
>
Author: Guang Mei
> INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fat City
Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego,
California -- Mailing list and web
hosting services
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
>
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note
EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a
line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you
want to be removed from). You may
> also send the HELP command
for other information (like subscribing).
>
--
Please see the
official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author:
AK
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City
Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego,
California -- Mailing list and web
hosting
services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To
REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT
spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line
containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be
removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other
information (like
subscribing).
|
*********************************************************************This e-mail
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank
you.*********************************************************************1
