Did you open an iTar with Oracle? If so, what severity was it logged at? How
you answer certain questions on the iTAR form will impact the severity of
the tar, and as a result the time for responses from Oracle.

RF

-----Original Message-----
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: 8/7/2003 1:49 PM

That fixed it, thank you.
 
I still haven't heard from oracle support yet.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:44 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



You it is a bug .... 


alter session|system set "_unnest_subquery"=false 
/ 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------- 
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com 
All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art ! 


-----Original Message----- 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:34 PM 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 


While I am waiting for oracle support to respond to my tar update (2nd 
callback) I am just wondering if anybody has found this problem. 

We have the following select query (from a peoplesoft implementation) 

SELECT a.emplid, a.effdt 
FROM PS_JOB A 
WHERE A.EFFDT = (SELECT MAX(A1.EFFDT)  FROM PS_JOB A1 WHERE A.EMPLID = 
A1.EMPLID AND A.EMPL_RCD = A1.EMPL_RCD  AND A1.EFFDT <= SYSDATE) 
AND A.EFFSEQ =  (SELECT MAX(A2.EFFSEQ)  FROM PS_JOB A2  WHERE A.EMPLID =

A2.EMPLID  AND A.EMPL_RCD = A2.EMPL_RCD  AND A.EFFDT = A2.EFFDT) 
AND A.EMPL_STATUS = 'A' 
and a.emplid='3442' 

when we run the query we get one row back, but when we replace the field

names with count(*), the resulting answer back is "2".  
We have tested it in 8.0.5.1.1 and we get the correct results, 1 row, 
and a count of 1. 

Darren 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------- 
Darren Browett P.Eng                                            This 
message was transmitted 
Data Administrator                                              using 
100% recycled electrons 
Information and Communication Technology 
City of Coquitlam 
P:(604)927 - 3614 
E:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------- 



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
<http://www.orafaq.net>  
-- 
Author: Browett, Darren 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
<http://www.fatcity.com>  
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services 
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message 
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in 
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L 
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may 
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). 

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Freeman Robert - IL
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to