Title: Message
What was the final outcome? 
 
Thanks,
Ruth
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Tanel Poder
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:19 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: new server + RAID = ???

I thought the BANRD was over, after successfully completed the battle against non-redundant disks?
 
Tanel.
----- Original Message -----
From: Binley Lim
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 2:59 AM
Subject: Re: new server + RAID = ???

Since the DB is 40GB, one 70GB drive will do. All the OS, Oracle binaries as well as the DB should fit in nicely. And no BAARF problems either ;-)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:29 AM
Subject: RE: new server + RAID = ???

 
What type of storage?  How much? 
 
Matt

--
Matthew Zito
GridApp Systems
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: 646-220-3551
Phone: 212-358-8211 x 359
http://www.gridapp.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fedock, John (KAM.RHQ)
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 5:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: new server + RAID = ???

I know this topic is brought up often (BAARF, I believe) ..... but I just found out we have a new server arriving, and I have the luxury of setting up the database from scratch.  I never had the chance to offer input into the disk layouts, so can anyone point out some white papers or offer any other advice?
 
This will be an HP-UX 11i o/s, database will need to be 8.1.7.4 due to some application limitations.  I would classify it as more batch than OLTP and will start out around 40GB.
 
TIA.
 
John
 
 

John Fedock
"K" Line America, Inc.
www.kline.com 
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 

Reply via email to