Try milliseconds from the epoch - 1/1/1970

select to_date('01/01/1970','mm/dd/yyyy') + ( 1069716948959 / (24*60*60*1000) ) from dual

You really need to know how the timestamp column is defined by your app.

Jared




"Nguyen, David M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 12/16/2003 02:09 PM
 Please respond to ORACLE-L

       
        To:        Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        cc:        
        Subject:        RE: Unreadable time_stamp format



Now I got.
 
USER_NAME             TIME STAMP
--------------------              ----------------------
eholley                       1069716948959
jmdavis                       1069715246467
jmdavis                       1069715324466
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobak, Mark
Sent:
Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:54 PM
To:
Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:
RE: Unreadable time_stamp format

 
Since it's a NUMBER datatype, try:
SQL>  column time_stamp format 99999999999999999999
SQL>  select user_name, time_stamp from USER_ACTIVITY_LOG;
 
-----Original Message-----
From:
Nguyen, David M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Tuesday, December 16, 2003 4:39 PM
To:
Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:
Unreadable time_stamp format

I need to view time_stamp column in USER_ACTIVITY_LOG table but it displays unreadable format as shown below.  Is there a way to decode it to be readable?

SQL> desc USER_ACTIVITY_LOG

 Name                                      Null?    Type

 ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------

 TIME_STAMP                              NOT NULL NUMBER(20)

 NODE_NAME                               NOT NULL VARCHAR2(20)

 USER_NAME                                NOT NULL VARCHAR2(20)

 CLIENT_IP                                    NOT NULL VARCHAR2(15)

 DESCRIPTION                              NOT NULL VARCHAR2(2048)
 

SQL>select user_name, time_stamp from USER_ACTIVITY_LOG;

edscott              1.0693E+12

edscott              1.0693E+12

edscott              1.0693E+12

edscott              1.0693E+12

jmdavis              1.0693E+12

edscott              1.0693E+12

edscott              1.0693E+12

Thanks,
David

Reply via email to