Stephen, Smaller copy, possibly a different execution plan?
Daniel Stephen Andert wrote: > Mike, > > Thanks for the tip, but I have already prefixed the owner for both > tables so that shouldn't be a problem. That did give me an idea for som > additional testing. When I made a smaller copy of the PEAR table, all > queries work correctly. This tells me there might be something "unique" > about the original table. > > I'll be doing more testing. Stay tuned and I'll post updates as I make > new discoveries. > > Thanks > Stephen -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Daniel Fink INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
