Is your system overloaded e.g. there is a
continuous queue of transactions waiting?
In that case, with bigger redologs, full
checkpoints happen less frequently, allowing database to work faster, thus
generating more redo.
But, othervise, the archive generation shouldn't be
dependent on redolog size.
How are you measuring your archive size, just
counting number of files/entries from v$archived_log or summing up real sizes of
archivelogs? (´these may differ noticeably, especially when frequent manual
logswitches occur or archive_lag_target is set).
Tanel.
|
- Difference on ArchiveLog (I'm rewriting the question) Vélez
- Re: Difference on ArchiveLog (I'm rewriting the question) Tanel Poder
- Re: Difference on ArchiveLog (I'm rewriting the question) Jared Still
- Re: Re: Difference on ArchiveLog (I'm rewriting the quest... Vélez
- Re: Re: Difference on ArchiveLog (I'm rewriting the quest... Tanel Poder
- Re: Re: Difference on ArchiveLog (I'm rewriting the quest... Tim Gorman