I agree with David. To me is sounds like you are saying you want portlet.description to end up with something like: "5,99,6,33" where 5,99,6,33 represent param_exceptions.
Please, one simple example can go a long way. Mike On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:27 AM, ddf <orat...@msn.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 12, 11:56 am, Vlad <vladimir.mcbad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry for the delayed response. > > > > param_exception contains lots of different values for param_char_val > > and portlet_code as the key field > > > > portlet table currently contains null values against description and > > has the key portlet_code as well (which patches param_exception). > > > > I want to update portlet.description with all the different values for > > param_exception.param_char_val. > > We really need some sample data, and the DDL for the tables involved, > to provide any useful assistance outside of guesswork. > > > David Fitzjarrell > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Oracle PL/SQL" group. To post to this group, send email to Oracle-PLSQL@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to oracle-plsql-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Oracle-PLSQL?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
