No it won't. This is why Gilles suggested renaming the shell buffer in
order to be able to start a new shell buffer. You'll go back to the
buffer where you started wvdial; oops! I thought I was replying to a
follow-up question from Torrance. But I guess I have answered your
question.
Cheers.
Kalyan
Nigel Stoppard writes:
> Just want to know,
> but will entering alt x shell a second time start a new shell buffer?
>
> Thanks,
> Nigel
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kalyan Mukherjea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Oralux mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 6:25 AM
> Subject: [Oralux] Wvdial
>
>
> > Hello Torrance,
> > Open a shell in Emacs (M-x shell RETURN)
> > Then give the command wvdial &
> > When you have finished your work with the dial-up connection, go back
> > to this shell buffer (you can do this by repeating M-x shell RETURN)
> > now press RETURN you will be at a prompt. Give the command
> > killall wvdial RETURN. Wvdial and all processes it might have started
> > will get terminated. Now you can kill the shell buffer.
> > Cheers.
> > Kalyan
> >
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > OK, this morning when I tried to disconnect the modem by killing
> > > the buffer containing wvdial, it stayed connected somehow. Is there any
> > > other way to free the modem?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Terrence
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Oralux mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://lists.freearchive.org/mailman/listinfo/oralux
> > _______________________________________________
> > Oralux mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.freearchive.org/mailman/listinfo/oralux
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oralux mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freearchive.org/mailman/listinfo/oralux
_______________________________________________
Oralux mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freearchive.org/mailman/listinfo/oralux
