Andy Easton's reference to the AOS practice of having an alternate replace a 
member of its Nominating Committee during that part of a session during which 
a member is being considered for an elected post, or whenever there is any 
other possible perceived self-interest, by no means removes the strong 
possibility of such a perception.  For example, remarks by the conflicted member that 
prejudice some other members against a proposed nominee may open the way for the 
nomination of that committee member even though he or she later leaves the 
room. It is critically important that there be no possible perception of 
conflict of interest whenever a nominating committee makes an unexpected and highly 
divisive nomination. Yet that is precisely what happened at the meeting of the 
AOS Nominating Committee. In that environment, another of its nominations that 
might otherwise have  created no criticism also was taken. With all the 
public press and widespread attention that has been given to perceived conflicts of 
interest in the business and financial world, and especially given the need 
by the AOS to have all of its members rally around the organization during this 
period of financial need for its very survival, the Committee showed an 
appalling lack of sensitivity and awareness of the likely adverse consequences of 
its behavior. It may or may not have been in the best interests of the 
organization to advance Howard Bronstein, but a decision not to advance him, despite 
the traditional order of succession, should not have been accompanied by 
nominations that create such obvious suspicions of skullduggery and other base 
motives. For that reason, the slate proposed by the Nominating Committee should be 
rejected and a new slate selected that will not be inherently subject to 
charges of the sort that are splitting the AOS apart at a time when it can ill 
afford it. David Grove. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.   
_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids

Reply via email to