Hello Mark,

Global warming isn't the problem, the problem is that the people who are in charge 
have a different agenda and priority. Alltough scientists find it rather difficult to 
come up with a solid pointer to the fact it is happening (the majority of the research 
has a statistical component that leaves interpreters with uncertanties) there are a 
lot of "small pointers" that don't seem to find attention (phenology; movement of 
plant, insect, land- and sea animal habitats; insurance-companies are seriously 
raising their costs; ...)

I hope I don't come over as one of those pessimistic "told you so" backseat drivers. 
My personal feelings on the event are rather opposite: if global warming is gonna give 
us trouble, it's simply because humanity as a species is less smart than it thinks it 
is. Darwin must be spinning in his grave :D

We're not in charge, nature is.

thanks for reading,
Frederick

>One topic that comes up on the OGD every now and then is the use of 
>carbon dioxide to speed up orchid growth. This is an interesting article 
>on carbon dioxide and plant growth. One thing to keep in mind that AJ 
>Hicks has pointed out in the past is that orchids are survivalist, and 
>can grow in less then ideal situations when some nutrients are not 
>available.
>
>Carbon dioxide theory debunked
>
>Many scientists hope the rising concentration of carbon dioxide in the 
>atmosphere will be offset by greater growth of plants on the Earth's 
>surface. A study in the journal Science suggests this may be wishful 
>thinking. Plant matter is made up largely of carbon-based molecules 
>synthesized when plants capture carbon dioxide from the air during 
>photosynthesis. The forests, grasslands and phytoplankton of the oceans 
>are all huge sinks for carbon in the environment. If plants grow faster 
>or bigger in the presence of more carbon dioxide, theoretically they 
>could drain off some of the excess carbon entering the atmosphere 
>through the burning of fossil fuels and other human activities. A 
>research team led by Bruce Hungate at Northern Arizona University 
>studied what happened to Galactia elliottii, a vine in the bean family 
>that grows in coastal Florida, during a seven-year experiment in which 
>enclosed but roofless plots of land were exposed to elevated 
>concentrations of carbon dioxide.
>To accumulate carbon in the form of biomass, the vines also have to 
>accumulate -- or /"fix"/ -- nitrogen, another essential element in 
>living matter. Hungate and his colleagues used nitrogen fixation as a 
>yardstick for growth. In the first year of the experiment, the vines 
>doubled their nitrogen fixation -- clear evidence they were flourishing 
>in response to the higher carbon dioxide levels. That response fell off 
>rapidly, however. In the past three years, the elevated carbon dioxide 
>levels suppressed nitrogen below normal fixation.
>Why did this happen?
>It turns out the vines were running out of molybdenum, a trace metal 
>captured from soil that they need for one of their nitrogen-fixing 
>enzymes. When molybdenum became scarce, the excess carbon dioxide became 
>unusable.
>-- /Washington/ /Post/
>
> The following are quotes from an article on carbon dioxide emissions 
>credit trading of industries under the Kyoto treaty. It kind of gives 
>you an idea of the problem with carbon dioxide and global warming. The 
>US is not a signature to the Kyoto treaty.  
>
> As world takes halting steps, some try trading `hot air' to buy time on 
>climate
>
>By CHARLES J. HANLEY
>AP Special Correspondent
>
> "If carbon dioxide had a color, if people saw the sky getting darker, 
>people would have no problem recognizing what's going on," said 
>climatologist David Pierce of San Diego's Scripps Institution of 
>Oceanography.
>
>Some scientists and engineers said so much time has been lost that only 
>carbon "sequestration" -- technology to capture and store emissions -- 
>can save the climate. One calculated, however, that a Lake Michigan in 
>liquid CO-2 would have to be hoarded away in the next 100 years.
>
>The full article: 
>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2004/06/05/international1309EDT0538.DTL
>
>Mark Sullivan



Need a new email address that people can remember
Check out the new EudoraMail at
http://www.eudoramail.com
_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids

Reply via email to