Hello Bert, yes, you're totally correct. But what I hinted at was the fact that we're stuck with a model where no-one can put a magnitude on. One group shows us drastic increases in temp, the others a significant or a minor influence.
Or do you contradict me, Bert, if I say that extrapolation is the "sum of all fears" for a scientist? Frederick >Fredrick JM Depuydt faults the data indicative of Global Warming as >statistical in nature. Please note that an important concept of the Philosophy of >Science is that ALL data is statistical. Information that cannot be expressed as >within an explicit statistical probability is without meaning. Global Warming >is as real as any other fact of science. Bert >Pressman Need a new email address that people can remember Check out the new EudoraMail at http://www.eudoramail.com
_______________________________________________ the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids
