>A clever idea, but (tragically) not novel. Arditti mentions this in >one of his books; I think it was Ernst who tried graphite as a >substitute for charcoal, and the effects weren't nearly as good. >Ergo, there's something more to charcoal. :-) > >Cheers, > >-AJHicks >Chandler, AZ
Charcoal absorbs, correct? What doesn't it absorb? Perhaps it is balancing a proportion which we have miscalculated. In essence, perhaps less is more. Steve Topletz
_______________________________________________ the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids
