Dear Viateur and group,

What more can I add to Dr. Henry F. Oakeleys comments in reply to your
question about the identity of the plant depicted in Botanical Magazine 80:
t. 4807 (1854)? As the matter now stands I have erred in my comments on
this illustration, and I have learned a thing or two. However, although I
can well imagine why Sr. Pedro Ortiz Valdivieso believes that the plant in
this picture must be closer to Anguloa virginalis rather than to A. eburnea
(this was my first impression too, but I chose to ignore the rather spiky
perianth and concentrated my reply on the characteristics of the lip), I am
still surprised though to read that Dr. Henry F. Oakeley finds the lip of
this specimen, albeit untypical, acceptable for A. virginalis, with the
kink or 'swan's neck' at its base totally lacking (compare for instance
with the photo of A. virginalis in Orchid Digest 63(4): p. 16, bottom
right). The characteristics of the lip do also not concur with pertinent
details depicted in a set of field sketches that I have been given by Dr.
Henry F. Oakeley and which he made of, among other species, Ecuadorian and
Peruvian specimina of A. virginalis. So I guess material of A. virginalis
that is less typical in this respect must have come to his attention since
he drew these sketches (June 1996 and December 1994, respectively) and
finished the article in Orchid Digest 63(4). Or, could it be that the
drawing in Bot. Mag. 80: t. 4807 (1854) is also a concoction of different
species, as I understand from Dr. Henry F. Oakeleys reply the illustration
in Bot. Reg. (1844) 30: t. 60 is presently conceived to be? Whatever, the
latter being the case or not, I guess it is no longer relevant to Viateurs
original question since the illustration in Botanical Magazine 80: t. 4807
(1854) was only erroneously referred to as the iconotype of A. eburnea, and
it doesn't change the fact that I misinterpreted it.

As the genus Anguloa is one of my personal favourites (together with other
Euglossine bee-pollinated genera such as Gongora and Stanhopea), I am
obviously much looking forward to the book on this genus and the closely
related Ida and Lycaste.

Simon M. Wellinga / SymPhyto - Laboratory for in vitro plant propagation
Heerenveen
The Netherlands / EU
_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids

Reply via email to