The advantage is that breeding groups are broadly defined and likely to remain quite stable, even if there are further changes in the names of genera within a breeding group. In addition, hybrid names would be vastly simplified because instead of the proliferation of Nothogenera (intergeneric names now being used), there are only a few breeding groups that are frequently used to make hybrids. Without checking extensively I come up with Laeliana, Oncidiana, Pluerothallidana, Vandana, Maxillariana, Cymbidiana, Dendrobiana, and Cypripediana. I've probably left out a few (Bulbophyllums?), but the total number of breeding groups is likely to be less than 20, as opposed to the hundreds of Nothogenera now in use or contemplated.
If this or something like it were to be accepted, future changes in generic affiliation would help us understand our plants and our hybridizing programs better, without leading to the consternation of frequent changes to our plant labels or our memory banks.
My two cents, -- Steve Beckendorf Berkeley, California
_______________________________________________ the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com

