Chiron and Castro have split Brazilian Laelia into 4 genera (see below).
 
I wish they had not included some Sophronithis under Hadrolaelia. why not to leave Sophronitis as it was before? or maybe move some Hadrolaelia (pumila, praestans, alaorii, etc... well, the ones that have flower buds ready to bloom when the new leaves open and have no spathe) into a new genus or a section of Sophronitis? They seem quite diferent from L. purpurata and L. perrinii.
 
Keeping L. purpurata and S. coccinea on the same genus seems to me to be un unfinished task. They have split the smal ones, which are much alike, into Dungsia and Hoffmannseggella.
 
Dalton
 
According to Chiron and Castro, The list of Brazilian Laelia becomes the one below (the last Hoffnmannseggella, published months ago, are not included as yet. Neither are former Sophronitis).
 
Hoffmannseggella - The rupiculous ones
alvaroana
angereri
bahiensis
blumenscheinii
bradei
briegeri
cardimii
caulescens
cinnabarina
conceicionensis
crispata
duveenii
endsfeldzii
esalqueana
fournieri
ghillanyi
gloedeniana
gracilis
hegeriana
hispidula
itambana
kettieana
liliputana
longipes
macrobulbosa
milleri
mixta
munchowiana
pfisteri
reginae
rupestris
sanguiloba
flavasulina
tereticaulis
verboonenii


Dungsia - The epiphitic ones
harpophylla
kautskyi
marcaliana


Microlaelia - The small with terete leaves
lundii


Hadrolaelia - The ones resembling Cattleya plus the ones without spathe
alaorii
crispa
dayana
fidelensis
grandis
jongheana
lobata
perrinii
praestans
pumila
purpurata
sincorana
tenebrosa
virens
xanthina
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com

Reply via email to