Peter beat me to it. I remind everyone that this year 'Orchids' published an article delineating Pk's DNA analysis, the analysis was done expressly for forensic purposes.

K Barrett
N Calif, USA

Several people have claimed that once "legal" P. kovachii seedlings go
on general release in the outside world, those who own "illegal"
plants will be able to let them (or their progeny) surface without
fear of detection.

That statement is incorrect. We have been told that Manuel Arias has
only five legally-collected plants, each of which has been identified
by a name, and that these names are on record as being the parents of
any particular legally-exported flask. In order to be able to trace
all legal progeny of these 5 plants, all the Peruvians have to do is
subject the one leaf from each of the 5 parent plants to a simple
DNA-typing procedure, placing the results on record, and store the
surplus DNA in a fridge.

Demonstrating that any individual plant (or seedling) was NOT the
progeny of a cross between two of these 5 plants would then be a piece
of cake.... the sort of procedure that a competent technician could do
in a well-stocked lab. This procedure has become routine in
child-support and child-custody disputes since the test became cheap
enough to be affordable.

If the Peruvian authorities (or anyone else) wanted to demonstrate the
illegality of an individual plant, they could do so, and will be in a
position to do so for generations to come. The real question is, will
they want to ?

Cheers,
Peter O'Byrne
in Singapore

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar � get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/



_______________________________________________ the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD) [email protected] http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com

Reply via email to