The orchids (species of Apostasia and Neuwiedia) that are considered to be most evolutionarily primitive seem to me to be at least of comparable intellectual interest to those that are studied because they are of conventional horticultural interest (e.g. Phalaenopsis and groups of species related to them, along with other horticulturally popular groups). Studies of groups of genera at the edges of definition of the orchid family should help to define it (to the extent that such definition is possible), and they are beautiful both in themselves and in what they represent, even though they will probably never be made into corsages, sold as pot plants at garden centers, or spotlighted via mass media from coverage of orchid shows.
   Here are a few links for Apostasia and Neuwiedia:
http://www.orchidspng.com/Apostasia.html
http://www.orchidspecies.com/apostwallichii.htm
http://www.orchidspng.com/Neuwiedia.html

Brian O'Brien

--
Brian A. O'Brien, Department of Chemistry, Gustavus Adolphus College
800 West College Avenue, Saint Peter, Minnesota  56082  U.S.A.
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. (507)933-7310 fax (507)933-7041 http://www.gustavus.edu/~bobrien

_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[email protected]
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com

Reply via email to