Guido, My comments follow yours.
> 1) This has nothing to do with the markianum and tigrinum case. True, but the claimed circumstances are the same, just reversed. > 2) What did you receive - a Pdf file per email or a printed journal? PDF file > 3) when did you receive it. March 25, 2006 > 4) Reception days are very much important because if you received > something on May 28th in the mail from Brazil (just to use an example) , > it cannot have been published before May 26. No, as I have said before, reception dates mean nothing, as you also said in your first post. The date that counts is the publication date via legal means. In your example: I may have received something on May 28, but it could have been published a year before or six months before or just several days before. It proves nothing other than that it could not have been published AFTER May 28th. Which is not the issue here. > But when you received something by email. Then the affair is finished > because the code explicitly states that dissemination by electronic > means is not valid publication. No again, because publication via legal means can occur and then electronic copies may be distributed also. Don't know if this is the case in this instance, but just your claim that the name is not proper does not make it so. It is just your opinion until proven correct or false. > 5) Again why do you confuse issues by not stating the facts. I don't confuse any issues and I try always to state only facts, not conjectures as you do. > 6) again put your name to it. Don't be an anonymous trouble maker. I think everyone knows who the trouble maker is! > 7) I very much read your post attentively. And it was so damn clear that > it says nothing but confusing nonsense. As usual when boxed into a corner, you attack. > 8) you are right about the spell checker I know that. Just as an aside, I recall some time ago that you stated emphatically that you would never respond to a post that did not have the posters correct name ( don't know how you would determine this but these are your words not mine) on the post. Suggest you follow this edict. icones __________________________________________ > the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD) > [email protected] > http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com > _______________________________________________ the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD) [email protected] http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com
