In response to your questions:

"1) How do you propose that the CITES guys differentiate between plants that 
have really been salvaged and plants that have suffered "gratuitous salvage" ?"

CITES has a fairly straight-forward definition of "salvage."  If this is 
followed, there is no problem, except as you indicated regarding "gratuitous 
salvage" which does not meet the criteria.  In most cases, letters of 
permission 
from land owners, or appropriate state officials would provide the necessary 
supporting documents.

"2) Why does salvage have to be followed by export for profit, when 
replanting them somewhere nearby is usually a more environmentally-sound option 
?"

This question is irrelevent.  Noone is implying that salvage has to be 
followed with anything.  Sales and/or export for profit or otherwise are just a 
couple of options.  Replanting some or all of them in a suitable area is 
another. 

I always find it interesting that the few bad guys are used to illustrate 
what the officials are concerned about.  So, we are all treated as potential 
criminals.  Well, there are a few government officials which are corrupt - 
perhaps 
we should treat all of them as corrupt individuals and challenge what they do 
and why.  I don't think they would like that nor enjoy proving what they are 
doing is legal and within their job description.

Maybe in the case of the Canadian official, they should be required to 
provide the rule/regulation that specifies that sale of the salvaged plants 
disqualifies them from receiving an export permit.  I know I would demand it.

Unfortunately, CITES continues to interfere and add considerable expense to 
legal business.  The basic premise for CITES as it applies to plants is false.  
The placing of all orchids on Appendix II was arbitrary and capricious.  Yet 
nothing is being done about it.  As long as nothing of consequence is being 
done about it, except to provide for the large commercial exporters of Europe 
and Asia, it needs to be brought up.  So, Peter, when CITES can be shown for 
what it is, I will continue to bring it up.  And this is one of the proper 
forums 
on which to do so .

Carson E. Whitlow
Adel, IA

_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[email protected]
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com

Reply via email to