I seem to have missed the beginning of this thread but (limericks not 
withstanding) there is a potentially interesting aspect. Some contributers 
will be aware that some orchids are CAM (Crassulacean Acid Metabolism) 
plants; that is to say, they have the ability to keep their stomata closed 
during the day to conserve moisture. They delay gas exchange until the cool 
of the night and utilise an additional malic acid stage for the storage of 
CO2 which they then photosynthesise in the light of  the next day.

I recall from my distant undergraduate days that we could use something like 
nail varnish to paint onto the undersurface of the leaf (where most stomata 
are). When dry, a thin acetate 'peel' could be taken off with the physical 
imprint of microscopic leaf detail (indeed, even sub-microscopic as in SEM 
preparations!). This 'peel' could then be sandwiched between 35mm slide 
glasses and projected where the details could be effectively magnified as if 
with a microscope.

It occurs to me that peels made in the day and peels made in the night could 
reveal whether the stomata are/were open or closed.

I must dissolve some acetate and acetone or pluck up courage to buy myself 
some nail-varnish but, in the meantime, it would be interesting to know if 
anyone else has been down this road.
(ie; acetate peel projection, not the varnishing of their nails!)
John Stanley

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:00 AM
Subject: Orchids Digest, Vol 8, Issue 343


> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:13:11 -0400
> From: "Andrew Easton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [OGD] Counting stomata with magnifying glasses.
> To: <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> My oh My! The knowledge flows out. Iris reminds me of a childhood 
> limerick: There was an old man from Peru, who didn't have anything to do. 
> He sat on the stairs and counted his hairs and found he was seventy two. I 
> am sure counting stomatal numbers on a Phalaenopsis leaf would be 
> similarly enlightening.
>
> Andy Easton

_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[email protected]
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com

Reply via email to