On Sep 28, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Aaron J. Hicks wrote:

>          The exemption for flasked seedlings is not recognized by  
> the United States. Europe and other countries may recognize the  
> "washing"
> of "illegal" (?) plants by passage through sterile culture, but not  
> the United States.

AJ,
Well, if flasked seedlings are not permitted by the USFWS, then  
somebody needs to tell the Ag inspectors in Miami, Atlanta, and DFW.   
I brought in many flasks from Costa Rica, up front, inspected, and  
passed with nothing more than a phytosanitary permit for paperwork.   
Though there probably is a difference between hand-carried and  
shipped.  Fortunately, for hand-carried specimens plant material  
inspection is generally conducted by non-FWS personnel.   
Unfortunately, nowadays those are not necessarily USDA persons, but  
are Homeland Security employees, and the current generation of  
employees are not as well trained and are more liable to be bullying  
bureaucrats as opposed to the previous generations - and that being  
not only experienced, but confirmed by a high ranking USDA-PPQ officer.

More importantly, the following is on page 48494 of the 23 August  
2007 Federal Register, vol. 72, no. 163 (the pdf is available, and I  
can send it to you if you would like.  It is a 93 page document  
entitled Revision of Regulations Implementing the Convention on  
International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora  
(CITES)).  The PDF can also be had at http://www.fws.gov/permits/ 
FederalRegister/FederalRegister.shtml.  Downpage to the CITES  
documents.  CITES documents are available at www.cites.org.  This is  
most important as there are provisions and new regulations dealing  
with at least Appendix I plants, per your further comment. . .

> Ergo, plants exported without CITES permits that are propagated in  
> sterile culture that are then brought into the
> United States are considered "fruit of the poison tree," and they  
> and their subsequent progeny are considered illegal. Except, perhaps,
> their hybrids- which are also exempted under the treaty.


pj


§ 23.92 Are any wildlife or plants, and their parts, products, or  
derivatives, exempt?

(a) All living or dead wildlife and plants in Appendix I, II, and III  
and all

their readily recognizable parts, products, and derivatives must meet  
the

requirements of CITES and this part, except as indicated in paragraph  
(b) of

this section.

(b) The following are exempt from the requirements of CITES and do  
not need

CITES documents. You may be required to demonstrate that your specimen

qualifies as exempt under this section. For specimens that are exempt  
from

CITES requirements, you must still follow the clearance requirements for

wildlife in part 14 of this subchapter and for plants in part 24 of this

subchapter and 7 CFR parts 319, 352, and 355.

(1) Appendix-III wildlife and Appendix-II or -III plants.

(i) Where an annotation designates what is excluded from CITES

requirements, any part, product, or derivative that is specifically  
excluded.

(ii) Where an annotation designates what is covered by the Treaty,  
all parts,

products, or derivatives that are not designated.

(2) Plant hybrids.

(i) Seeds and pollen (including pollinia), cut flowers, and flasked

seedlings or tissue cultures of hybrids that qualify as artificially  
propagated

(see § 23.64) and that were produced from one or more Appendix-I  
species or

taxa that are not annotated to specifically include hybrids in the  
CITES list.

(ii) Specimens of an Appendix-II or -III plant taxon with an  
annotation that

specifically excludes hybrids.

(3) Flasked seedlings of Appendix-I

orchids. Flasked seedlings of an

Appendix-I orchid species that qualify

as artificially propagated (see § 23.64).
_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[email protected]
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com

Reply via email to