Logging of short and long-leaf pines in the South has been going on for
probably more than a century. It's not unusual to see convoys of logging
trucks speeding along the countryside state roads. Any sensible person keeps
their distance from these behemoths. It's not common but there are incidents
of a truck losing its load of massive trunks onto the road or even
unsuspecting motorists. But I don't know what the rest of the country would
do for pine lumber or pulpwood for paper products. The site where the trees
were harvested looks like a war zone when the harvesting machines are done.
The tops of the trees and all the limbs are shot through grinders and left
on the ground to rot. This does have a good effect of enriching the
otherwise rather poor southern soils. The land may have been planted
specifically with this in mind and the trees grown as a rotational crop, in
which case the land is replanted immediately with new seedlings. The land
may be privately or corporately owned. The land could also be harvested from
a private owner who just decided to harvest his forest. This is not usually
replanted. But here in the South, the line of succession progresses rapidly
from war zone through dominance of various shrubs and pioneer trees, on up
to the pines. In drier areas, this is the end of the line. Natural fires
keep hardwood seedlings from even starting. 

Some by products may be reclaimed during the processing of this valuable
resource but a good deal is not. It wasn't too long ago that processing pulp
was a smelly, polluting business and could be smelled miles away. The
waterways struggled to recycle the waste. But the mills have cleaned up
their act considerably. But still a large portion of the wood harvest is
wasted. Add to this the waste from small lumber harvest companies and
independent contractors who remove problem trees storm damaged trees from
private owners and municipalities. Useable lumber is hauled away to sell at
the mill while the contractors search for more space to dump the huge piles
of ground up waste.

I can't see any problem with using this waste or even growing crop trees to
feed biomass generators. The piles of unused branches and leafy portions
that are deemed 'unusable' will release carbon dioxide as they decompose
anyway. These huge piles of unwanted waste won't mar the countryside if
there's a good use for them. And the land recycles quickly whether helped by
man or not.

There may be some negative issues involved here which should be addressed.
But I think that the idea as a whole should be approached with a positive
attitude and deal with the problems individually rather than the other way
around.

Gary

_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[email protected]
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com

Reply via email to