Norman Gray <[email protected]> writes: > I mean, IdPs are a good idea, and all that, but I'd prefer an IdP to be an > IdP, and not a spinoff of a data-collection service. > > (It's not completely unreasonable for Twitter, in its role as a > networking/branding/self-aggrandisement service, to be an IdP, and I > might sign up with that in the end, if it looks worth it, but I'd > rather labourdigital gave me the option to just give them a username > and password).
I used to use Twitter early-on for that reason; their terms were simple and reasonable, it was acknowledged that everything was public (no false sense of privacy), etc. I switched away after http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-14493497 Cheers, Chris -- Please support ORG's work - join and help fund our future: https://www.openrightsgroup.org/join To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [email protected] or use https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/org-discuss
