Thanks very much for your response! All-in-all this is excellent news.
- I have analytics folks on staff who are familiar with SQL and will be resistant to either abstract access to the data (which might be too restricting) or learning a new query language. It is only in this sense and for establishing the initial OrientDB class hierarchy and cluster arrangements that I would want to "step outside" of tinkerpop. - My concern with Frames is the potential for future disconnects between POJOs and database structure (and maybe performance as well? -- I'm looking at inserting something on the order of 75,000 records per second) - Having no dependency on Rexster is also pleasing to hear as I don't find it terribly likely that we'll be swapping out database technologies once we get the ball rolling. On the other hand, being able to add useful extensions would be a plus. All of this helps tremendously! Thanks again! Jon PS I used to be in the DC area and would have been intrigued to hear more, but I relocated to New Orleans a few years ago :) -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
