Hi Riccardo, good question. In OO the underlying property should overwrite the base one, but this could drives to problems and unexpected behaviors. But if this is what you need the collate shouldn't be propagated to the sub-field because it should be managed as an overriding of the base field.
May you open an new issue attaching this test case? Lvc@ On 14 April 2014 10:19, Riccardo Tasso <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, I can't decide if I found a bug. When I change the collate for a > field, also the fields with the same name of the super-classes change > collate. I understood that for a hierarchy of classes the field is the > same, but this behaviour seems to me a bit unexpected. > > In attachment you'll find the test-case. > > Cheers, > Riccardo > > > 2014-04-14 9:23 GMT+02:00 Riccardo Tasso <[email protected]>: > > >> 2014-04-14 9:15 GMT+02:00 Riccardo Tasso <[email protected]>: >> >> Thanks, can I do it with a console command? >> >> >> Yes, it is done by: >> >> ALTER PROPERTY MyClass.my_property COLLATE ci >> >> Thanks for the suggesion, it seems to work. >> >> Riccardo >> > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OrientDB" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
