Hi Dmitriy, Everything is still open and what Steve created is a POC to study the best serialization mechanism for OrientDB 2.0. I personally like to manage schema-less fields at the tail of the records.
Lvc@ On 23 May 2014 17:21, Dmitriy Krasnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > I tried to follow the discussion, but it went from storing field names and > serializations of classes, to binary serialization too quickly. > What is a final decision on storing fields for strict class definition? > I am a little afraid on global field catalog, for a cases where millions > of records created with schema free layout and system looking up and > creating new fields in catalog for each record. Schema full class > definition vs Schema free class definition sounds like perfect solution. > Are you still considering it for 2.0? > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OrientDB" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
