I've added a JUnit test in the comments to the issue.
https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/2405<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Forientechnologies%2Forientdb%2Fissues%2F2405&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFjfWMKnF_cHDP_kZlP3L0OPFcxgQ>


On Thursday, May 29, 2014 4:07:51 AM UTC-4, Artem Orobets wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Looks like an incorrect usage of RidBag by graph functions.
>
> Could you provide a dataset or test case to reproduce it?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Artem Orobets
>
> * Orient Technologiesthe Company behind OrientDB*
>  
>
> 2014-05-29 8:34 GMT+03:00 odbuser <[email protected] <javascript:>>:
>
>>
>> I've created the issue:
>> https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/2405<https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Forientechnologies%2Forientdb%2Fissues%2F2405&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFjfWMKnF_cHDP_kZlP3L0OPFcxgQ>
>>
>> Setting it the configuration to 0 has the same issue.  Setting it to 1000 
>> fixed it but I assume it will not work for size >= 1000.
>>
>> OGlobalConfiguration.RID_BAG_EMBEDDED_TO_SBTREEBONSAI_THRESHOLD.setValue( 
>> 1000 );
>>
>> This is a really bad issue but the workaround is to use raw property 
>> names instead of the graph notation.
>>
>> in_AtoB.out_AtoC.size()
>> instead of
>>
>> in('AtoB').out('AtoC').size()
>>
>> With the understanding that the bad syntax will return null if no C's 
>> exist as opposed to 0 in the graph syntax.
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 4:54:20 PM UTC-4, Lvc@ wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> this could be related to the "ridBag.embeddedToSbtreeBonsaiThreshold" 
>>> setting that is 80 by default. Please could you repeat the test setting 
>>> this before to open the database?
>>>
>>> OGlobalConfiguration.RID_BAG_EMBEDDED_TO_SBTREEBONSAI_THRESHOLD.setValue( 
>>> 1000 );
>>>
>>> or also:
>>>
>>> OGlobalConfiguration.RID_BAG_EMBEDDED_TO_SBTREEBONSAI_THRESHOLD.setValue( 
>>> 0 );
>>>
>>> Then please can you open a new issue?
>>>
>>> Lvc@
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28 May 2014 22:33, odbuser <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> OrientDB 1.7 (also failed on snapshots)
>>>>
>>>> I have a strange issue with the size() function in an SQL query.  It's 
>>>> happening in a very basic database but not in my unit test... and possibly 
>>>> on Windows only.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the basic schema:
>>>> A -AtoB-> B
>>>> A -AtoC-> C
>>>>
>>>> Starting from B, navigate B->A->C and count C.
>>>> Query:
>>>> select in('AtoB').out('AtoC').size() from B
>>>>
>>>> When the size is greater than at least greater than 67 and definitely 
>>>> 80 and above, the size comes back as 0.  If I change the query to:
>>>> select in_AtoB.out_AtoC.size() from B
>>>>
>>>> It always returns the correct count but this is not a good syntax to 
>>>> use since it will return null when no Cs exist not to mention that it's 
>>>> relying on the graph implementation specific properties...
>>>>
>>>> I've tried recreating the database with the same issue.  I can't share 
>>>> the problematic database and am trying to create a reproducible case but 
>>>> in 
>>>> the meantime, any ideas as to how this could happen?
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "OrientDB" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  -- 
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "OrientDB" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OrientDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to