I would like to +1 medved's sentiments... please do not drop support for the object database. On 07 Jul 2014 1:41 PM, "medved" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I started using OrientDB because it is an "Object Database". I am not > interreseted (yet) in a graph db or document db even if I am pleased to > know I will always be able to use them if needed. > > I use the Object Database Interface since version 0.9 (I am currently > running v1.5.x on several project). I encountered a lot of bug since the > begining, and as the version I use right now is running fine for me it's > why I didn't upgrade (but I have plan to). > > Removing Object Interface is a _huge_ step back for me. And your > workaround doesn't make sense for my project (really ... going through o2r > mapping looks a better choice). > > Could you be really clear on the situation as I would be able to take > decision for myself: spending time to upgrade my project to new OrientDB > doesn't make sense if you (slowly) drop any support on Object Interface. > > Still, thanks for all your work done on OriendDB. > > > One more though: Is there so much need for a Graph Database on the market > instead of a real Object Database ? I still don't get how in 2014 we all > use OO langage but no OO native persistence ! > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OrientDB" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
