I note also that in the first case I get files built in the datafolder of
the name {Class.INDEX_NAME}.{irs,sbt} and in the latter I get indexes built
in the luceneindexes directory below the data directory, so clearly there
are different implementations here.
On Monday, July 21, 2014 11:54:48 AM UTC-4, Alan Johnson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding the potential differences in behavior between
> the full text index types I can choose from when building an ODB. From
> within the studio I have the option of:
>
> FULLTEXT
> FULLTEXT_HASH_INDEX
>
> from the console. with the orientdb-lucene plugin installed (v1.7.4)
> against a 1.7.6 database (which may be a problem, but doesn't appear to be)
> I can create a FT index via command:
>
> create index {Class.Index_NAME} on Class(Property) FULLTEXT ENGINE LUCENE
>
> It appears that retrieval behavior is different, depending on which
> approach I take (it does NOT seem to like having both types of indexes
> present on a given Property, even though it allows them to be defined), but
> that just may be my query syntax ignorance.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alan
>
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OrientDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
