select * from Abstract where [appln_abstract] LUCENE "solar"

Just wanted to add the other try and the error what comes with it:

java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com.orientechnologies.orient.core.sql.
OIndexSearchResult.getLastField()Lcom/orientechnologies/orient/core/sql/
filter/OSQLFilterItemField$FieldChain;

Am Dienstag, 19. August 2014 18:31:36 UTC+2 schrieb Curtis Mosters:
>
> select * from V where appln_abstract LUCENE "solar"
>
> runs 0,16 seconds, I didn't say anything. Sorry for not reading the 
> special syntax and thank you very much =)
>
> Just another question. If I write this one here:
>
> select * from V where blabla LUCENE "solar"
>
> so I'm getting the same results. How can that be. So the question is how 
> can I tell Lucene to just take *Abstract.appln_abstract* for it's search? 
> Taking *Abstract *instead of *V* gives me an error.
>
> Am Dienstag, 19. August 2014 15:41:21 UTC+2 schrieb Enrico Risa:
>>
>> Hi Curtis 
>> the Second one Lucene it is not the correct way to query the lucene index
>>
>> see here for the docs
>>
>>
>> http://www.orientechnologies.com/docs/1.7.8/orientdb-lucene.wiki/Full-Text-Index.html
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-08-19 15:03 GMT+02:00 'Curtis Mosters' via OrientDB <
>> [email protected]>:
>>
>>> Ok let me combine all OrientDB results here:
>>>
>>> 34 sec (SB-Tree FULLTEXT)
>>>
>>> select * from Abstract where appln_abstract LIKE "%of a pipe of the 
>>> pipe%"
>>>
>>> 25 sec (Lucene FULLTEXT)
>>>
>>> select * from Abstract where appln_abstract LIKE "%of a pipe of the 
>>> pipe%"
>>>
>>> 3 sec (no index was set)
>>>
>>> select * from Abstract where appln_abstract CONTAINSTEXT "of a pipe of 
>>> the pipe"
>>>
>>> This is what I have tested.
>>>
>>> Am Dienstag, 19. August 2014 12:51:24 UTC+2 schrieb Enrico Risa:
>>>>
>>>> Hi  Curtis
>>>>
>>>> 3 sec without FullText index ?
>>>> select * from Abstract where appln_abstract CONTAINSTEXT "of a pipe of 
>>>> the pipe"
>>>>
>>>> can you post the explain of the previous query?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How do you run the  LUCENE query?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-08-19 10:50 GMT+02:00 'Curtis Mosters' via OrientDB <
>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> Wow, I tested 
>>>>>
>>>>> select * from Abstract where appln_abstract CONTAINSTEXT "of a pipe 
>>>>> of the pipe"
>>>>>
>>>>> on 280k entries without index. It was running 3 sec till I got a 
>>>>> result.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then I tested again on the Lucene indexed 280k database and it took 20 
>>>>> sec.
>>>>>
>>>>> So how can that be. I read that OrientDB is already indexing. But from 
>>>>> Neo4j I know that Lucene is much faster. But why in my case it's 7x 
>>>>> slower? 
>>>>> Which indexer is used when you don't explicitly set an indexer? 
>>>>>
>>>>> Am Montag, 18. August 2014 21:33:30 UTC+2 schrieb Enrico Risa:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Curtis
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the LIKE operator doesn't use the FULLTEXT index.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you retry the query with the CONTAINSTEXT 
>>>>>> operator. It should be faster because rely on the FULLTEXT index
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.orientechnologies.com/docs/1.7.8/orientdb.wiki/SQ
>>>>>> L-Where.html
>>>>>>  see here
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-08-18 20:47 GMT+02:00 'Curtis Mosters' via OrientDB <
>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I now tried it with Lucene and the index creating is much *faster*. 
>>>>>>> =)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also tested again both ways:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    1. Importing without index: 120 sec + Indexing 80 sec
>>>>>>>    2. Importing with index: 340 sec
>>>>>>>    + extracted 274.139 records (686 records/sec) - 274.139 records 
>>>>>>>    -> loaded 274.13
>>>>>>>    8 vertices (686 vertices/sec) Total time: 339809ms [0 warnings, 0 
>>>>>>>    errors]
>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>> So is Lucene actually faster when building up the index afterwards? 
>>>>>>> Or is my computer really that crappy so that my 100% cpu usage really 
>>>>>>> harming the benchmark?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They query from above was done in ~25 sec, so it's also a bit 
>>>>>>> faster. Can that be true?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am Montag, 18. August 2014 17:23:40 UTC+2 schrieb Enrico Risa:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Curtis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> can you post the result of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> explain select * from Abstract where appln_abstract LIKE "%of a 
>>>>>>>> pipe of the pipe%"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2014-08-18 17:19 GMT+02:00 'Curtis Mosters' via OrientDB <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm still testing around with OrientDB. Today I realized that 
>>>>>>>>> OrientDB is 3 times slower on the same data, with the same indexer 
>>>>>>>>> compared 
>>>>>>>>> to MySQL. How can that be?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So there are ~250k entries. FULLTEXT indexer are used on both 
>>>>>>>>> db's. (from https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/
>>>>>>>>> wiki/Indexes)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And the test query is:
>>>>>>>>> select * from Abstract where appln_abstract LIKE "%of a pipe of 
>>>>>>>>> the pipe%"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> in OrientDB: 34 sec
>>>>>>>>> in MySQL: 14 sec
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I tested this on them both 3 times and this is the average.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups "OrientDB" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "OrientDB" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>
>>>>> --- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "OrientDB" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "OrientDB" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OrientDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to