Hi Luca,

No, unfortunately this does not solve the problem either. Even setting 
everything to 0 did not provide any gains.

If I understand you correctly this is a Hazelcast problem and not a 
OrientDB problem?

I would gladly pay someone to get this fixed!

Regards,
- Ben

On Thursday, September 11, 2014 1:06:51 PM UTC+2, Lvc@ wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
> Current version is asynchronous as well. For your problem you should set 
> the backup parameter in hazelcast.xml file to avoid each message is 
> synchronously replicated in all the servers:
>
> <hazelcast>
>   ...
>
>   <queue name="tasks"> 
>
>     ...
>
>     <!-- Number of backups. If 1 is set as the backup-count for example, then 
> all entries of the map will be copied to  another JVM for fail-safety. Valid 
> numbers are 0 (no backup), 1, 2 ... 6. 
> Default is 1. -->
>
>     <backup-count>1</backup-count>
>
>
>     <!-- Number of async backups. 0 means no backup. -->
>
>     <async-backup-count>0</async-backup-count> 
>     ... 
>
>   </queue>
>
> </hazelcast>
>
>
> Try to create a new queue entry in XML file by using the naming 
> conventions:
> Request queue (1 per server/database): 
> orientdb.node.<node>.<database>.request
> Response queue (1 per server): orientdb.node.<node>.request
>
> So if your database name is demo and your nodes are "node0" and "node1", 
> do this:
>
> <hazelcast>
>   ...
>
>   <queue name="orientdb.node.node0.demo"> 
>
>       <backup-count>0</backup-count>
>
>       <async-backup-count>1</async-backup-count> 
>
>   </queue>
>
>   <queue name="orientdb.node.node1.demo"> 
>
>       <backup-count>0</backup-count>
>
>       <async-backup-count>1</async-backup-count> 
>
>   </queue>
>
>   ...
>
> </hazelcast>
>
>
> For more information look at:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/hazelcast/queue$20backup%7Csort:date/hazelcast/g3-yk3PS64g/UANKYX1m6FQJ
>
> Lvc@
>
> On 11 September 2014 10:44, <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Hope it supports 100% asynchronous replication this time.
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Ben
>>
>> On Thursday, September 11, 2014 10:26:10 AM UTC+2, Riccardo Tasso wrote:
>>>
>>> Very interesting, can't wait for 2.0 :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>    Riccardo
>>>
>>> 2014-09-10 19:32 GMT+02:00 Luca Garulli <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>> For who missed the Hazelcast's Webinar of yesterday I've published the 
>>>> presentation online:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.slideshare.net/lvca/orientdb-and-hazelcast
>>>>
>>>> Lvc@
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "OrientDB" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  -- 
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "OrientDB" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OrientDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to