LINKSET is more scalable. Lvc@
On 24 October 2014 16:33, Kevin Daly <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it LINKEDLIST or LINKSET that is the most scalable? > > > On Friday, October 24, 2014 8:02:43 AM UTC-4, Kevin Daly wrote: >> >> I using ideas expressed in the time series use case listed below. >> >> https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/wiki/Time-series-use-case >> >> I have a case where I I've broken down the graph by the hour in my time >> series graph, but updating the logs links is having a huge impact on >> performance. >> >> for every log insert I need to update the hour record to add the link to >> the LINKSET with this update >> >> update <RID> add logs =<RID> >> >> If I don't do this update to update the link to the hour object, I am >> getting approximately 11,000 events per second.. Once I add in this update, >> I end up lowering this to about 700 to 800 events per second. >> >> I am currently looking at processing 5000 events per second so in one >> hour there would be 18,000,000 RID's stored per hour block.. Is this >> practical? >> > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OrientDB" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
