Hi,
you can do:

traverse out() from parent while $depth < 10

Without the while condition you risk to have huge traversals.

Best Regards,

Luca Garulli
CEO at Orient Technologies LTD
the Company behind OrientDB
http://about.me/luca.garulli


On 24 April 2015 at 21:20, Jeffrey Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think I found the answer to my last question in the Udemy course- no, I
> would need to chain out() calls to the desired depth.
>
> How would I use traverse to do the same thing but up to an arbitrary depth
> where I want the response to be the nodes?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
>
> On Friday, April 24, 2015 at 3:11:32 PM UTC-4, Jeffrey Miller wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, I will give that I try.
>>
>> Is there a general rule of thumb for traverse vs select? Will select
>> automatically recursively keep traversing relationships?
>>
>> On Friday, April 24, 2015 at 10:30:35 AM UTC-4, l.garulli wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jeffrey,
>>> It's simpler:
>>>
>>> *select out() from parent*
>>>
>>> retrieves the outgoing collection. If you want that vertices as result,
>>> use the expand:
>>>
>>> *select expand( out() ) from parent*
>>>
>>> Lvc@
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24 April 2015 at 16:20, Jeffrey Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is there up to date documentation about how to use traverse for the
>>>> Graph mode? I been trying to do a very simple query looking for the nodes
>>>> that are connected by an edge to a parent node ( parent ---E---> child) ,
>>>> and I have seen 3 different ways to do this
>>>>
>>>> traverse V.out, E.in from parent
>>>> traverse out() from parent
>>>> traverse out_edge_name from parent
>>>>
>>>> The last two seem to work, but I think its giving me the edges, not the
>>>> connected nodes themselves. I suspect I need to use the expand function,
>>>> but I am not sure. Any hints on the correct way to do graph traversal
>>>> (perhaps this would better be executed with a select?) or pointers to
>>>> documentation would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, December 12, 2014 at 7:17:23 AM UTC-5, Andrei Serea wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think I figured out how to go around the size limit of the query in
>>>>> Graph editor:
>>>>> When I write the query directly in the Graph Editor, I cannot set the
>>>>> limit, as I can in the Browse section. And I think it is implicitly set to
>>>>> 20.
>>>>> If, however I write the same query in the Browse , set the limit to
>>>>> 200 and then do  "Send to Graph", I see the entire result.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "OrientDB" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Luca Garulli
>>> CEO at Orient Technologies LTD
>>> the Company behind OrientDB
>>> http://about.me/luca.garulli
>>>
>>>   --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OrientDB" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OrientDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to