hmm, concerning

On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 4:33:25 PM UTC+2, André Marques wrote:
>
> I did some load tests using the connection pool and had some problems, I 
> don't think the connections are threadsafe, or is not stable.
> Using one connection for all requests didn't work well, looks like the 
> connection executes only one statement at time.
> Then I tested using one connection per request and the response time were 
> a lot better.
> I think that the connection per request is the best way right now.
> I'm new to orientdb, so I might be wrong.
>
> To close the connection you have to call the close() method
> var server = oriento({...});
> var db = server.use({...});
> ...
> server.close();
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 6:51:32 AM UTC-3, Samuel Goldenbaum wrote:
>>
>> thanks Andre
>>
>> From what I undertand Oriento will open a new connection as needed when 
>> you try to access the db - at what point is this connection closed? Are the 
>> connections threadsafe?
>>
>> On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 4:38:55 PM UTC+2, André Marques wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> You can also use the connection pool:
>>>
>>> var server = Oriento({
>>>   host: 'localhost',
>>>   port: 2424,
>>>   username: 'root',
>>>   password: 'yourpassword',
>>>   pool: {
>>>     max: 10
>>>   }
>>> });
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, May 29, 2015 at 4:12:27 AM UTC-3, Samuel Goldenbaum wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What is the recommended way to manage OrientDB connections in 
>>>> Express.js or any web application for that matter? Connection per request? 
>>>> Would be using the oriento Node.js driver.
>>>>
>>>>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OrientDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to