Hi guys, I'd have a lot to say about this benchmark and the way they managed it... I wrote a comment on that post but has been canceled. They used a dirty database with tons of duplicated links. Download they database they used ( https://s3.amazonaws.com/nosql-sample-data/orientdb-community-2.1.rc4.tar.bz2) it and check it by yourself ;-)
Actually OrientDB numbers are better than what has been reported in that charts and OrientDB is the faster DBMS than any others on most of them. About singleread and neighbors2 tests, I already explained why OrientDB is not the fastest one. By the way, those numbers are relative to a machine with 16 vCores and 60GB RAM. On a more common machine (8 cores and 16GB RAM), numbers are completely different. Since it's not allowed for us to comment the original blog, we'll re-run that benchmark and we'll publish results somewhere else. Best Regards, Founder & CEO OrientDB <http://orientdb.com/> On 8 July 2015 at 13:54, scott molinari <[email protected]> wrote: > For anyone interested, ArangoDB did rerun the benchmark tests with the ODB > corrections and ODB did come out a lot better, but other than straight > writes, it looks like Arango is still performing considerably better. > > > https://www.arangodb.com/2015/06/how-an-open-source-competitive-benchmark-helped-to-improve-databases/ > > > Scott > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OrientDB" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
